Meet the clock. Keep the signature.
The deadline is the regulator’s. The signature is yours. TeamIntel does the work in between — every case assembled with its sources, finished inside the window, and put in front of the person who has to sign it. Your own instance, your region, no training on your data.
Free, 3 working days, your own cases. No workshop, no proof of concept, no roadmap.
Someone set your deadline. It was not you.
Six hours to answer an elective outpatient pre-authorisation, and 0.03% of the net claimed amount per day for every day you are late. Five banking days to examine a presentation. Free time that expires while the paperwork moves. A budget calendar that does not shift because a submission came back.
Regulatory figures on this page are drawn from secondary reporting retrieved on 27 July 2026 (Al Tamimi & Company; GCC Board Directors Institute; DIFC and ICC publications). Confirm the current text of any instrument before relying on it contractually.
Does this sound familiar?
A rejected claim sits for three weeks
You get two resubmissions and the first one was a guess. Nobody had time to pull the coding rationale, so it went back thin — and the second attempt is now the only one left.
The presentation arrived on Tuesday
Five banking days later you either refused it properly, with every discrepancy citing its article, or you own it. There is no third outcome and no extension.
The container cleared
The demurrage did not stop while three teams looked for the delivery order. By the time the file was complete, the charge was larger than the margin on the shipment.
Finished work. Not advice.
Not a recommendation, not a dashboard, not a score. A completed case in your system of record, inside the regulated window. These nine lines are agreed in writing before the first case moves.
| Incoming unit | One rejected claim, one budget submission, one disputed charge, one presentation |
|---|---|
| Finished output | The completed case, every determination citing its document, version and article |
| Destination system | Yours — and the mandated submission format, in the format it mandates |
| Volume | Agreed per month, not open-ended |
| Turnaround | Agreed per case type, inside the regulated window |
| Quality threshold | First-pass acceptance, measured — not asserted |
| Approver | A named person in your organisation |
| Price | Fixed per completed case, or per volume tier |
| Cancellation point | After the first month |
How it starts. You can stop after each one.
Sample batch — free
3 working days, one real batch of 30–50 cases. You get the finished work and a short recording: input, agent work, human approval, result in its destination. A signed agreement comes first. 2 a month, because the founders deliver them.
First batch — fixed per queue
Real volume, with a deadline you measure us against. Volume, turnaround, quality threshold and your named approver agreed before the start. Cancellable after the first month. Rework at our cost if the threshold is missed.
Standing capacity — from AED 12,000
The queue is covered, month after month, priced per completed case. The next queue only after the first one runs reliably — a second queue on top of a first one that is still wobbling helps nobody.
Your own instance — on request
Your environment, customer-managed keys, administered by your people. Same product, same price line; what changes is who runs the shift.
No workshop. No proof of concept. No roadmap.
An agent team, not a chatbot.
Company Brain
Your policy terms, benefit tables, network rules, contracts and prior cases, read once and kept current. A determination is made against your documents, not against a general model’s memory of the industry.
Specialists that disagree in the open
Separate agents assemble the case, check entitlement and check compliance. Where they disagree, the disagreement is written into the file rather than averaged away — that is the part a reviewer reads first.
Every fact with its document
Document, version, page or article on every determination. This is why the resubmission limit matters: a rebuttal has to be right the first time, and a cited rebuttal survives review.
Read-only first
We start by reading an export. A write scope into your system is a separate decision, made later, logged when it is granted, and never assumed.
Nothing executes until one of your people signs it.
Finding
A case needs a decision - context assembles from your systems.
Agent review
Specialist analyses challenge the recommendation - policy, compliance, evidence.
GATE 1Consensus
A structured verdict - rationale, disagreements, unresolved evidence.
Human approval
The named quality, clearing or compliance owner decides. Nothing runs without this.
✓ GATE 2Execution
Only approved actions execute in your systems - logged and signed.
logged · signedA name on every decision, by construction.
Article 18, answered by design
Under the UAE PDPL, a decision with legal effect cannot simply be automated. TeamIntel is built the other way round: no such decision leaves the system without a named human approving it. That is the architecture, not a setting.
Regulation 10, as a by-product
For DIFC-regulated firms, an Autonomous Systems Officer needs impact assessments, a system register and an incident record. Every one of those is produced by normal operation here — not by a separate compliance project running alongside.
Autonomy you raise, not us
Every queue starts at the lowest tier, where a person releases each case. Raising it is your decision, taken per queue, logged when it is taken, and reversible.
Regulatory figures on this page are drawn from secondary reporting retrieved on 27 July 2026 (Al Tamimi & Company; GCC Board Directors Institute; DIFC and ICC publications). Confirm the current text of any instrument before relying on it contractually.
Your instance. Your region. Your keys.
A dedicated instance, hosted in-region, with customer-managed keys and no training on your data. In health and financial services this is an entry condition rather than a feature, so it is stated here and detailed once, on the governance page — including the list of what we never read under any circumstances.
Throughput per approver.
One qualified, accountable person supervises many times the caseload. The assembly work happens underneath; the decision seat stays senior, stays human and stays yours. What changes is how much of the work reaches it — the people you already trust put their name on more of what leaves the building, not less.
Four queues, four clocks.
Health insurance operations
Denial management and resubmission on the provider side; pre-authorisation triage for payers and TPAs. The unforgiving clock, and where we start.
Community and service charge management
Service charge budgets and submission packs, every line item traced to a contract, an invoice or a prior-year actual — against a calendar that does not move.
Freight and customs operations
Demurrage and detention claim packs, with the causation narrative assembled and the recoverable amount calculated. Classification review feeds it.
Trade finance operations
Document examination and the discrepancy advice, every finding citing its article, inside the examination period.